Frank Dikotter - Revision history

imported>Azadsingh: /* On Maoist China */ Link

2025-10-12T23:12:34Z

On Maoist China: Link

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 12 October 2025
Line 88:		Line 88:
	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

	'''Many children who starved to death between 1958 and 1962 would have not been alive in 1958 had infant mortality stayed at the pre-1949 level.'''		'''Many children who starved to death between 1958 and 1962 would have not been alive in 1958 had infant mortality stayed at the [[Century of Humiliation\|pre-1949 level]].'''

	- Lucien Bianco, Historian, Professor, EHESS in Paris<ref name="Fish" />		- Lucien Bianco, Historian, Professor, EHESS in Paris<ref name="Fish" />

imported>Azadsingh: Add example

2025-10-12T22:44:50Z

Add example

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 12 October 2025
Line 57:		Line 57:
	: ''See also'': [[Mao Zedong]], [[1958-61 Chinese famine]]		: ''See also'': [[Mao Zedong]], [[1958-61 Chinese famine]]

	In the West, ''Mao's Great Famine'' (2010) received praise from the [[mainstream media]] but mostly negative reviews from intelligent readers, including pro-Western academics.		In the West, ''Mao's Great Famine'' (2010) received praise from the [[mainstream media]]<ref>[[New York Times]] on [[Yang Jisheng]] https://web.archive.org/web/20170124011617/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/books/review/tombstone-the-great-chinese-famine-1958-1962-by-yang-jisheng.html</ref> but mostly negative reviews from intelligent readers, including pro-Western academics.

	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

imported>Azadsingh: Link to century of humiliation

2025-10-12T21:08:30Z

Link to century of humiliation

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 12 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Frank Dickotter''' is an academic fraud and supporter of [[Big Pharma\|opium]] addiction.		'''Frank Dickotter''' is an academic fraud and supporter of [[Big Pharma\|opium]] addiction.

	Dikotter is most known for his books directly slandering [[Mao Zedong]]'s [[China]], but his first few books went about it indirectly, glorifying pre-Mao opium addiction as "''Narcotic Culture''" and brutal despotic KMT rule as "''The Age of Openness''".<ref name="Fish">David Fishman's blog, containing academic quotes on Dikotter. https://www.feelingthestones.com/p/when-mainstream-success-trumps-scholarly</ref>		Dikotter is most known for his books directly slandering [[Mao Zedong]]'s [[China]], but his first few books went about it indirectly, glorifying [[Century of Humiliation\|pre-Mao]] opium addiction as "''Narcotic Culture''" and brutal despotic KMT rule as "''The Age of Openness''".<ref name="Fish">David Fishman's blog, containing academic quotes on Dikotter. https://www.feelingthestones.com/p/when-mainstream-success-trumps-scholarly</ref>

	==On pre-Maoist China==		==On pre-Maoist China==

	: ''See also'': [[Big Pharma]], [[Century of Humiliation~~]], [[Famines before Mao~~]]		: ''See also'': [[Big Pharma]], [[Century of Humiliation]]

	''Narcotic Culture'' (2004), attempting to rehabilitate the opium era, was demolished by almost all reviews.		''Narcotic Culture'' (2004), attempting to rehabilitate the opium era, was demolished by almost all reviews.
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Having highlighted the achievements of the new republican [[cosmopolitanism]], the crucial question is how it related to rural poverty, especially in crisis situations.		Having highlighted the achievements of the new republican [[cosmopolitanism]], the crucial question is how it related to rural poverty, especially in crisis situations.

	One wonders why no mention is made of the [[~~Famines before Mao~~\|1928-31 ~~Chinese famine~~]], which is described as the most deadly in the republican period, with an estimated death toll of 10 million.		One wonders why no mention is made of the [[1928 Chinese famine\|famine of 1928-31]], which is described as the most deadly in the republican period, with an estimated death toll of 10 million.

	: - Andrea Janku, [[SOAS]]<ref name="Fish" />		: - Andrea Janku, [[SOAS]]<ref name="Fish" />

imported>Azadsingh: Change link

2025-10-12T21:02:25Z

Change link

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 12 October 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==On pre-Maoist China==		==On pre-Maoist China==

	: ''See also'': [[Big Pharma]], [[Century of Humiliation]]		: ''See also'': [[Big Pharma]], [[Century of Humiliation]], [[Famines before Mao]]

	''Narcotic Culture'' (2004), attempting to rehabilitate the opium era, was demolished by almost all reviews.		''Narcotic Culture'' (2004), attempting to rehabilitate the opium era, was demolished by almost all reviews.
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Having highlighted the achievements of the new republican [[cosmopolitanism]], the crucial question is how it related to rural poverty, especially in crisis situations.		Having highlighted the achievements of the new republican [[cosmopolitanism]], the crucial question is how it related to rural poverty, especially in crisis situations.

	One wonders why no mention is made of the [[~~Chinese famine of 1928-31~~\|1928-31 Chinese famine]], which is described as the most deadly in the republican period, with an estimated death toll of 10 million.		One wonders why no mention is made of the [[Famines before Mao\|1928-31 Chinese famine]], which is described as the most deadly in the republican period, with an estimated death toll of 10 million.

	: - Andrea Janku, [[SOAS]]<ref name="Fish" />		: - Andrea Janku, [[SOAS]]<ref name="Fish" />

imported>Azadsingh: /* On pre-Maoist China */ Note era

2025-10-12T20:26:44Z

On pre-Maoist China: Note era

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 12 October 2025
Line 43:		Line 43:
	Even [[Wikipedia]] admits "These works have been poorly received by academics".<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Dik%C3%B6tter</ref>		Even [[Wikipedia]] admits "These works have been poorly received by academics".<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Dik%C3%B6tter</ref>

	''The Age of Openness'' (2008) successfully demonstrates that [[Shanghai]] elites enjoyed [[cosmopolitan]] degeneracy, ignoring how most of the country suffered under human-hunting slaver warlords.		''The Age of Openness'' (2008) successfully demonstrates that [[KMT]]-era [[Shanghai]] elites enjoyed [[cosmopolitan]] degeneracy, ignoring how most of the country suffered under human-hunting slaver warlords.

	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

imported>Azadsingh: Create

2025-10-12T20:23:05Z

Create

New page

'''Frank Dickotter''' is an academic fraud and supporter of [[Big Pharma|opium]] addiction.

Dikotter is most known for his books directly slandering [[Mao Zedong]]'s [[China]], but his first few books went about it indirectly, glorifying pre-Mao opium addiction as "''Narcotic Culture''" and brutal despotic KMT rule as "''The Age of Openness''".<ref name="Fish">David Fishman's blog, containing academic quotes on Dikotter. https://www.feelingthestones.com/p/when-mainstream-success-trumps-scholarly</ref>

==On pre-Maoist China==

: ''See also'': [[Big Pharma]], [[Century of Humiliation]]

''Narcotic Culture'' (2004), attempting to rehabilitate the opium era, was demolished by almost all reviews.

<blockquote>

Narcotic Culture stands out as the most aggressive bid to re-interpret the history of opium. The book is animated by one overwhelming idea: that opium was not “bad.” ...

On the other hand, the authors also float some extraordinary propositions that go not only beyond received wisdom, but beyond actual evidence and even common sense.

: - Timothy Brook, Republic of China Chair, Department of History, University of British Columbia

</blockquote>
<blockquote>

Narcotic Culture appears to be one of the revisionist histories... aimed at convincing us that [[imperialism]] wasn’t all that bad, or at least that we should not blame the imperialists, in this case the opium traders who made vast fortunes from the trade, from the social problems they created.

The authors of Narcotic Culture…are clearly, and curiously, opposed to the development of medical science, viewing such developments as attempts to control the self-treatment of disease.

: - Kathleen Lodwick, Prof of History, Penn State University

</blockquote>
<blockquote>

The volume is full of sweeping claims based on very slim evidence.

: - Alan Baumler, History Dept, Indiana University of Pennsylvania

</blockquote>
<blockquote>

[T]he book has reinforced the case [against opium addiction] it seeks to demolish.

: - John Wong, University of Sydney<ref name="Fish" />
</blockquote>

Even [[Wikipedia]] admits "These works have been poorly received by academics".<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Dik%C3%B6tter</ref>

''The Age of Openness'' (2008) successfully demonstrates that [[Shanghai]] elites enjoyed [[cosmopolitan]] degeneracy, ignoring how most of the country suffered under human-hunting slaver warlords.

<blockquote>
Having highlighted the achievements of the new republican [[cosmopolitanism]], the crucial question is how it related to rural poverty, especially in crisis situations.

One wonders why no mention is made of the [[Chinese famine of 1928-31|1928-31 Chinese famine]], which is described as the most deadly in the republican period, with an estimated death toll of 10 million.

: - Andrea Janku, [[SOAS]]<ref name="Fish" />
</blockquote>

==On Maoist China==

: ''See also'': [[Mao Zedong]], [[1958-61 Chinese famine]]

In the West, ''Mao's Great Famine'' (2010) received praise from the [[mainstream media]] but mostly negative reviews from intelligent readers, including pro-Western academics.

<blockquote>
"boldly and engagingly [[historical revisionism|revisionist]]"
: - The New Yorker<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/12/20/staying-power-3</ref>

</blockquote>
<blockquote>

MGF may become the best-known account of the GLF famine for a while. But should it? It is not a comprehensive account of the famine; it is dismissive of academic work on the topic; it is weak on context and unreliable with data; and it fails to note that many of the horrors it describes were '''recurrent features of Chinese history over the previous century or so'''.

: - Cormac Ó Gráda, Professor Emeritus, University College Dublin<ref name="Fish" />

</blockquote>

Pro-Western historians have blasted Dikotter for distorting fellow anticommunist [[Yang Jisheng]]'s archive-based work.

<blockquote>

In these chapters, Dikötter’s contribution to scholarship is to strip Yang’s archival discoveries and synthesis of published material of the historical context provided by Yang...

The allegations Dikötter levels at Yang here are bewildering. They are either sloppily drawn or disingenuous.

- Anthony Garnaut, historian of China, University of Oxford<ref name="Fish" />

</blockquote>

Even intense anticommunists like Lucien Bianco have criticized Dikotter as lacking "prudence".

<blockquote>

'''Many children who starved to death between 1958 and 1962 would have not been alive in 1958 had infant mortality stayed at the pre-1949 level.'''

- Lucien Bianco, Historian, Professor, EHESS in Paris<ref name="Fish" />

</blockquote>

Andrew Walder of Cambridge wrote that Dikotter's '''high death estimate cannot be reconciled''' with age-specific population data.<ref>Walder, Andrew George (2015). China under Mao: a revolution derailed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. p. 364. ISBN 978-0-674-05815-6.</ref>

==References==
[[Category: Imperialist historians]]