Jump to content

2018 Douma Chemical Attacks: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task)
 
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Douma chemical attack''' (April 7, 2018) — allegedly a chlorine/sarin attack by Syrian government forces on the rebel-held Damascus suburb of Douma — was the proximate trigger for US-British-French missile strikes on Syria (April 14, 2018), launched before OPCW investigators could complete on-site work.
'''Douma''' — the April 2018 alleged chemical attack used to justify strikes on Syria — was debated by Haz directly, on the forensics.


== Controversy ==
== From the [https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/youtube/black-lenin/g7xr5rm_w28/ Haz vs Ellen | InfraredShow Debate] ==
* The OPCW's final report (2019) found "reasonable grounds" chlorine was used, but did not attribute it.
* The canister: "In the video, is the canister on the ground? No, it's not. It's on the roof... So the canister just conveniently fell right on this hole? 'I think the canister created the hole.' Yeah, of course, like that's exactly what that would look like, right? So what does this picture prove exactly?"
* Leaked internal OPCW documents (2019, published by Wikileaks and the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media): the original engineering assessment by inspector Ian Henderson found the cylinder damage inconsistent with the claimed aerial delivery; a Fact-Finding Mission report's findings were altered; a team member testified the final report "did not reflect the views" of the deployed investigators. The OPCW denied wrongdoing but refused to allow the dissenters to brief member states.
* The physics: "Look at the scale of damage — it's like an exact hole... Concrete is weaker than rebar; that's why rebar reinforces concrete. We don't use concrete to reinforce rebar."
* Independent journalists (Aaron Maté, Max Blumenthal) and the leaks made Douma the emblematic case of chemical-weapon narrative manipulation after the Iraq WMD precedent.
* Ground truth over armchair forensics: "None of it matters, because the doctor who was on the ground in Douma [testified differently]..."


== Infrared usage ==
== The position ==
Infrared cites Douma as the Iraq playbook repeated: unverifiable atrocity claims, weaponized inspectors, strike first investigate later — the mechanism of humanitarian interventionism (see [[OPCW]], [[Scott Ritter, Waging Peace book]]).
The Douma photos are stage-managed evidence — a cylinder resting neatly on a rebar-reinforced roof hole betrays the story. Same playbook as Iraq WMD: unverifiable atrocity claims, inspectors overruled, strike first ([[OPCW]], [[Scott Ritter, Waging Peace book]]).


== See also ==
== See also ==

Latest revision as of 10:50, 21 August 2026

Douma — the April 2018 alleged chemical attack used to justify strikes on Syria — was debated by Haz directly, on the forensics.

  • The canister: "In the video, is the canister on the ground? No, it's not. It's on the roof... So the canister just conveniently fell right on this hole? 'I think the canister created the hole.' Yeah, of course, like that's exactly what that would look like, right? So what does this picture prove exactly?"
  • The physics: "Look at the scale of damage — it's like an exact hole... Concrete is weaker than rebar; that's why rebar reinforces concrete. We don't use concrete to reinforce rebar."
  • Ground truth over armchair forensics: "None of it matters, because the doctor who was on the ground in Douma [testified differently]..."

The position

The Douma photos are stage-managed evidence — a cylinder resting neatly on a rebar-reinforced roof hole betrays the story. Same playbook as Iraq WMD: unverifiable atrocity claims, inspectors overruled, strike first (OPCW, Scott Ritter, Waging Peace book).

See also

References