Khrushchev Lied: Difference between revisions
imported>Azadsingh Add further reading |
Azadsingh2 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Khrushchev Lied is a historical analysis and deep-dive published originally in 2007 by Professor [[Grover Furr]] that examines the veracity and historicity of claims made by [[Nikita Khrushchev]] in his infamous "Secret Speech" | Khrushchev Lied is a historical analysis and deep-dive published originally in 2007 by Professor [[Grover Furr]] that examines the veracity and historicity of claims made by [[Nikita Khrushchev]] in his infamous "[[Secret Speech]]" to the 20th Party Congress of the [[Soviet Union]] on February 20th, 1956. | ||
The first section examines each of the sixty-one discretized assertions or so-called "revelations" made by Khrushchev in light of documentary evidence, primary sources, and some secondary sources. | The first section examines each of the sixty-one discretized assertions or so-called "revelations" made by Khrushchev in light of documentary evidence, primary sources, and some secondary sources. | ||
The second section is devoted to methodological questions and typology of identified falsehoods. | The second section is devoted to methodological questions and typology of identified falsehoods. | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* [[Secret Speech]] | |||
* [[Nikita Khrushchev]] | * [[Nikita Khrushchev]] | ||
* [[List of myths about Stalin]] | * [[List of myths about Stalin]] | ||
[[Category: Communist historians]] | |||
[[Category: Soviet Union]] | |||
[[Category: Counter-propaganda]] | |||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 29 August 2026
Khrushchev Lied is a historical analysis and deep-dive published originally in 2007 by Professor Grover Furr that examines the veracity and historicity of claims made by Nikita Khrushchev in his infamous "Secret Speech" to the 20th Party Congress of the Soviet Union on February 20th, 1956.
The first section examines each of the sixty-one discretized assertions or so-called "revelations" made by Khrushchev in light of documentary evidence, primary sources, and some secondary sources.
The second section is devoted to methodological questions and typology of identified falsehoods.