67
edits
m
→1969 Planned Parenthood "Jaffe memo"
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Elite Malthusian agenda == | == Elite Malthusian agenda == | ||
Along with direct statements from elites associated with Malthusian organizations like the World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, Planned Parenthood, etc., etc., we now have a number of documents that have come to light since the 70s showing that the elites have long sought to lower the birth rate and the population, both of America and the world in general. | Along with direct statements from elites associated with Malthusian organizations like the World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, Planned Parenthood, etc., etc., we now have a number of documents that have come to light since the 70s showing that the elites have long sought to lower the birth rate and the population, both of America and the world in general, and how they sought to do so. | ||
=== 1969 Planned Parenthood "Jaffe memo" === | === 1969 Planned Parenthood "Jaffe memo" === | ||
[[File:Jaffe Memo.jpg|thumb|Summary included in the memo of anti-natalist proposals ]] | [[File:Jaffe Memo.jpg|thumb|Summary included in the memo of anti-natalist proposals ]] | ||
Frederick S. Jaffe was associated with Planned Parenthood from 1954 to 1974 and was Vice President for much of that time. In 1969 he sent a memo to Bernard Berelson, head of the Rockefeller-funded Population Council, proposing that the potential effectiveness of a number of plans to reduce the population growth to 0% be studied. He and his fellow Malthusians wanted to reduce America's population growth both for | Frederick S. Jaffe was associated with Planned Parenthood from 1954 to 1974 and was Vice President for much of that time. In 1969 he sent a memo to Bernard Berelson, head of the Rockefeller-funded Population Council, proposing that the potential effectiveness of a number of plans to reduce the population growth to 0% be studied. He and his fellow Malthusians wanted to reduce America's population growth both for "ecological" reasons, and because he thought it was necessary to do so, so that the government could "compel" developing nations to do the same, although he recognized the first was easier to practically advocate for. He proposed that first off, the effectiveness of on-demand abortion and contraception be studied and what kind of legal, political, etc. changes would need to be made to provide these. If abortion and contraception alone wouldn't reduce the population growth rate, he proposed that a number of other policies be studied, like: | ||
# Whether welfare and free social services are pro or anti natalist, and what changes would need to be made accordingly | # Whether welfare and free social services are pro or anti natalist, and what changes would need to be made accordingly | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# "''The effect on fertility of policies to encourage higher educational levels for everyone''", and the current and potential effects on fertility of policies and programs regarding the education of women | # "''The effect on fertility of policies to encourage higher educational levels for everyone''", and the current and potential effects on fertility of policies and programs regarding the education of women | ||
# Whether or not the U.S farm policy "of encouraging the amalgamation of family farms into 'agrobusinesses'" has been effective (and if not, what farm policies could be adopted to destroy family farms, and by implication lower fertility by causing rural-urban migration) | # Whether or not the U.S farm policy "of encouraging the amalgamation of family farms into 'agrobusinesses'" has been effective (and if not, what farm policies could be adopted to destroy family farms, and by implication lower fertility by causing rural-urban migration) | ||
# If home ownership causes higher fertility, and if so, | # If home ownership causes higher fertility, and if so, how it could be discouraged | ||
# How to convince business leaders that lower fertility wouldn't harm their bottom line | # How to convince business leaders that lower fertility wouldn't harm their bottom line | ||