Jimmy Carter: Difference between revisions
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Jimmy Carter''' | "'''"Jimmy Carter''' appears in Haz's Palestine argument — the liberal system's own progenitor forced into honesty. | ||
== | == From the [https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/0c383ecb-e747-41b7-a5f7-e798f2b19ac1/ RED PILL NEWS | IRAN-ISRAEL WAR? stream] == | ||
== | > "If you read Jimmy Carter's own memoirs — even politicians like Jimmy Carter, who were progenitors of the global liberal system, the progressive unipolar one of the U.S. — even he is forced to acknowledge the great injustice that's going on... Senior U.S. officials, think tanks, politicians, all of them, privately or in some cases publicly, acknowledge there is a Palestinian right to self-determination." | ||
== The context == | |||
The argument: the liberal order absorbed past struggles (Reagan absorbing MLK's whitewashed civil rights, the same with South African apartheid) — but Palestine is the "inconvenient situation" it cannot absorb. When even Carter, a founder of that order, concedes the injustice, the system's moral vocabulary is exhausted ([[Anglo Box]], [[Laura Loomer]]). | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Third Way]] | * [[Third Way]] | ||
| Line 17: | Line 14: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:People]][[Category:American politics]] | [[Category:People]][[Category:American politics]][[Category:Palestine]] | ||
Revision as of 10:19, 21 August 2026
""Jimmy Carter appears in Haz's Palestine argument — the liberal system's own progenitor forced into honesty.
> "If you read Jimmy Carter's own memoirs — even politicians like Jimmy Carter, who were progenitors of the global liberal system, the progressive unipolar one of the U.S. — even he is forced to acknowledge the great injustice that's going on... Senior U.S. officials, think tanks, politicians, all of them, privately or in some cases publicly, acknowledge there is a Palestinian right to self-determination."
The context
The argument: the liberal order absorbed past struggles (Reagan absorbing MLK's whitewashed civil rights, the same with South African apartheid) — but Palestine is the "inconvenient situation" it cannot absorb. When even Carter, a founder of that order, concedes the injustice, the system's moral vocabulary is exhausted (Anglo Box, Laura Loomer).