Jump to content

State: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task)
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''The State''' is treated by Haz Al-Din neither as liberal neutral arbiter nor as simple instrument of the bourgeoisie, but as the '''form of political unity''' a people takes which revolutions must capture, deepen, and transform rather than abolish by decree.
'''The State''' is neither liberal neutral arbiter nor simple bourgeois instrument — it's the '''form of political unity''' a people takes, which revolutions capture, deepen, and transform rather than abolish by decree.


== Key positions from the streams ==
== From the streams ==
* Against the vulgar "withering away" ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/07274b7b-0196-4bcf-8711-fcd1640071af/ Huge updates stream]): "There was a specific interpretation of Marxism — I hate this interpretation — which says that in the withering away of the state, the centralization of authority will disappear, and everyone will just willy-nilly do whatever they want. Mao said: I don't actually think the state will ever wither away. We're always going to need these courts..." — governance and statecraft are permanent responsibilities of wise rule.
* Against vulgar withering-away ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/07274b7b-0196-4bcf-8711-fcd1640071af/ Huge updates stream]): "There was a specific interpretation of Marxism — I hate this interpretation — that in the withering away of the state, centralization of authority will disappear and everyone will just willy-nilly do whatever they want. Mao said: I don't actually think the state will ever wither away. We're always going to need these courts..." Governance and statecraft are permanent responsibilities.
* Withering as dynastic deepening ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/01b75999-cac8-4153-b7fe-53ddacd54b59/ FBI AFTER ME! stream]): asked if the abolition of the state would be a revolution, Haz answers that it corresponds to "a continual process of dyna[stic]..." — revolutions that "deepen and enrich the forms and qualitative determinations that emerge out of the revolution rather than liquidate them."
* Withering as dynastic deepening ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/01b75999-cac8-4153-b7fe-53ddacd54b59/ FBI AFTER ME! stream]): revolutions that "deepen and enrich the forms and qualitative determinations that emerge out of the revolution rather than liquidate them."
* Institutions reach limits: "civilizations, policies and states reach definite limits, and beyond those limits superstructurally try to conquer those limits, and in vain, and fail" ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/youtube/infrared/burj8ku0vao/ Marxism-Leninism in the Age of Multi-Polarity]).
* Institutions hit limits: "civilizations, policies and states reach definite limits, and beyond those limits superstructurally try to conquer those limits, and in vain, and fail" ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/youtube/infrared/burj8ku0vao/ Marxism-Leninism in the Age of Multi-Polarity]).


== The American application ==
== The American application ==
The distinction between '''country and state''' does the strategic work: "I believe there's more to this country than the rotten ruling class and state that has committed so many crimes on its behalf... I'm not giving up on the American people" ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/youtube/black-lenin/sevzfpn19fy/ Twitter Space]). Patriotism targets the regime, not the nation — the state to be captured is the American state tradition itself ([[Class]], [[New Deal]]).
Country ≠ regime: "I believe there's more to this country than the rotten ruling class and state that has committed so many crimes on its behalf... I'm not giving up on the American people" ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/youtube/black-lenin/sevzfpn19fy/ Twitter Space]). Patriotism targets the regime, not the nation ([[Class]], [[New Deal]]).


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Class]]
* [[Revolutionary Dynasty]]
* [[Revolutionary Dynasty]]



Revision as of 10:53, 21 August 2026

The State is neither liberal neutral arbiter nor simple bourgeois instrument — it's the form of political unity a people takes, which revolutions capture, deepen, and transform rather than abolish by decree.

From the streams

  • Against vulgar withering-away (Huge updates stream): "There was a specific interpretation of Marxism — I hate this interpretation — that in the withering away of the state, centralization of authority will disappear and everyone will just willy-nilly do whatever they want. Mao said: I don't actually think the state will ever wither away. We're always going to need these courts..." Governance and statecraft are permanent responsibilities.
  • Withering as dynastic deepening (FBI AFTER ME! stream): revolutions that "deepen and enrich the forms and qualitative determinations that emerge out of the revolution rather than liquidate them."
  • Institutions hit limits: "civilizations, policies and states reach definite limits, and beyond those limits superstructurally try to conquer those limits, and in vain, and fail" (Marxism-Leninism in the Age of Multi-Polarity).

The American application

Country ≠ regime: "I believe there's more to this country than the rotten ruling class and state that has committed so many crimes on its behalf... I'm not giving up on the American people" (Twitter Space). Patriotism targets the regime, not the nation (Class, New Deal).

See also

References