Jump to content

New Deal: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task)
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task)
Line 1: Line 1:
"'''"The New Deal''' appears in Haz's streams through the '''new class thesis''' — its overthrow as the origin of neoliberalism.
'''The New Deal''' appears through the '''new class thesis''' — its overthrow as the origin of neoliberalism.


== From the [https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/0f7c08ea-3a3f-4a62-bfa0-69d5531d0cc6/ TRUE RED PILL NEWS stream] ==
== From the [https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/0f7c08ea-3a3f-4a62-bfa0-69d5531d0cc6/ TRUE RED PILL NEWS stream] ==


> "There was a whole generation of new money that emerges in the post-war period of U.S. history that was bypassing central government U.S. regulations through the City of London. And this is where neoliberalism comes from. This is where Reaganomics comes from. Basically, the New Deal was overthrown by this new class... We're not really talking about a new class — we're talking about a new generation of the ruling class."
> "A whole generation of new money emerges in the post-war period bypassing central government U.S. regulations through the City of London. This is where neoliberalism comes from, where Reaganomics comes from. Basically, the New Deal was overthrown by this new class... We're not really talking about a new class — we're talking about a new generation of the ruling class."


> "Post-war liberal democratic ideology came from the New Deal actually... Obama's the culmination of that in a lot of ways. It doesn't mean Obama represents the legacy of the New Deal, just ideologically. When you think about this as a war between ideologies rather than conflicting material interests, it makes a lot more sense — because materially, not much has changed since Obama."
> "Post-war liberal democratic ideology came from the New Deal... Obama's the culmination of that ideologically. It doesn't mean Obama represents the legacy of the New Deal. When you think about this as a war between ideologies rather than conflicting material interests, it makes a lot more sense — because materially, not much has changed since Obama."


== The analysis ==
== Also ==
* Neoliberalism is not the ruling class's eternal nature but a '''factional victory within it''': the post-war generation routing around New Deal regulation via London finance.
The Manifesto planks read against it ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/2d1ebdec-de63-4a81-be9d-17a254901bc5/ RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE stream]): "FDR maybe did 20% of that; since then we haven't had anything like that" ([[World Land Bridge]], [[Corporate Socialism under FDR]]).
* The ideology outlives the material arrangement: Obama carries New Deal rhetoric while presiding over its negation — which is why "ideology vs. material interest" confusion paralyzes normal analysis ([[Anglo Box]]).
* The Manifesto planks read on stream ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/2d1ebdec-de63-4a81-be9d-17a254901bc5/ RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE stream]) — industrial armies for agriculture, abolition of town-country distinction — with the verdict "FDR maybe did 20% of that; since then we haven't had anything like that" ([[World Land Bridge]]).


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Corporate Socialism under FDR]]
* [[Harry S. Truman]]
* [[Capitalist Socialism]]


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 10:53, 21 August 2026

The New Deal appears through the new class thesis — its overthrow as the origin of neoliberalism.

> "A whole generation of new money emerges in the post-war period bypassing central government U.S. regulations through the City of London. This is where neoliberalism comes from, where Reaganomics comes from. Basically, the New Deal was overthrown by this new class... We're not really talking about a new class — we're talking about a new generation of the ruling class."

> "Post-war liberal democratic ideology came from the New Deal... Obama's the culmination of that ideologically. It doesn't mean Obama represents the legacy of the New Deal. When you think about this as a war between ideologies rather than conflicting material interests, it makes a lot more sense — because materially, not much has changed since Obama."

Also

The Manifesto planks read against it (RED PILL NEWS | FREE PALESTINE stream): "FDR maybe did 20% of that; since then we haven't had anything like that" (World Land Bridge, Corporate Socialism under FDR).

See also

References