Wanted debates: Difference between revisions
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Wanted debates''' — the community's dream-matchup list — reflects the debate culture that is the show's core. | |||
[This page awaits specific sourcing from | [This page awaits specific sourcing from community debate-wishlist discussions.] | ||
The sourced rules of engagement: | |||
* Good-faith first rounds; rematches when opponents claim false victory — the Keith Woods case ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/10ec3a31-ea24-45c9-8219-68350a003135/ INTENSE DEBATES | FBI ATTACK stream]). | |||
* | * No debates with dead ends: "We know what Trotskyism looks like. It's a dead end. I see nothing to debate about" ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/01b75999-cac8-4153-b7fe-53ddacd54b59/ FBI AFTER ME! stream]). | ||
* The standing challenge to evasive rivals: "Why don't you actually back up your argument with some kind of commitment? You can't." ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/0611ca77-3967-4e8d-9a99-0e5ce125788e/ RED PILL NEWS | * The standing challenge to evasive rivals: "Why don't you actually back up your argument with some kind of commitment? You can't." ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/0611ca77-3967-4e8d-9a99-0e5ce125788e/ RED PILL NEWS stream]). | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 21 August 2026
Wanted debates — the community's dream-matchup list — reflects the debate culture that is the show's core.
[This page awaits specific sourcing from community debate-wishlist discussions.]
The sourced rules of engagement:
- Good-faith first rounds; rematches when opponents claim false victory — the Keith Woods case (INTENSE DEBATES | FBI ATTACK stream).
- No debates with dead ends: "We know what Trotskyism looks like. It's a dead end. I see nothing to debate about" (FBI AFTER ME! stream).
- The standing challenge to evasive rivals: "Why don't you actually back up your argument with some kind of commitment? You can't." (RED PILL NEWS stream).