Joe Sims: Difference between revisions
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Joe Sims''' is | '''Joe Sims''' is CPUSA co-chair — the face of the Democrats-forever line, target of Haz's "ditch the Democrats" polemic, and later recipient of a guarded unity offer. | ||
== The polemic == | == The polemic == | ||
[https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/youtube/infrared/tpremeruqli/ Why the Communist Party Needs to DITCH the Democrats], addressed "to Joe Sims and Rossana Cambron": | |||
* The | * The popular-front-with-Democrats line subordinates the working class to "the Rockefeller bourgeoisie of the Democratic Party" — while Lenin said the monopoly bourgeoisie is inherently reactionary. | ||
* The CP's | * The CP's whole rubric for judging "progressive" derives from foundations funded by that same bourgeoisie. | ||
* On January 6 and | * On January 6 and elections: the CP defends "the illusion and veneer of democracy, not an actual democracy." | ||
== The opening == | == The opening == | ||
By 2025, with | By 2025, with Sims publicly repositioning ([https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/00e75c5d-493b-453c-9b4b-bca9603c6ed7/ COMMUNISM WINNING | WE'RE SO BACK stream]): "Guess who's breaking out of their shell? Joe Sims... If there's no difference between Joe Sims and ACP anymore, then let's talk." Unity on condition of actual independence from the Democrats — the Grotewohl question in American key ([[Rossana Cambron]], [[American Communist Party]]). | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[ | * [[Kruschev, Secret Speech]] | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:People]][[Category: | [[Category:People]][[Category:CPUSA]][[Category:American politics]] | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 21 August 2026
Joe Sims is CPUSA co-chair — the face of the Democrats-forever line, target of Haz's "ditch the Democrats" polemic, and later recipient of a guarded unity offer.
The polemic
Why the Communist Party Needs to DITCH the Democrats, addressed "to Joe Sims and Rossana Cambron":
- The popular-front-with-Democrats line subordinates the working class to "the Rockefeller bourgeoisie of the Democratic Party" — while Lenin said the monopoly bourgeoisie is inherently reactionary.
- The CP's whole rubric for judging "progressive" derives from foundations funded by that same bourgeoisie.
- On January 6 and elections: the CP defends "the illusion and veneer of democracy, not an actual democracy."
The opening
By 2025, with Sims publicly repositioning (COMMUNISM WINNING | WE'RE SO BACK stream): "Guess who's breaking out of their shell? Joe Sims... If there's no difference between Joe Sims and ACP anymore, then let's talk." Unity on condition of actual independence from the Democrats — the Grotewohl question in American key (Rossana Cambron, American Communist Party).