Asiatic mode of production: Difference between revisions
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''The Asiatic mode of production''' gets Haz's most memorable exposition — via Shrek. | |||
== | == From the [https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/07274b7b-0196-4bcf-8711-fcd1640071af/ Huge updates stream] == | ||
From the [https://infrared-transcripts.pages.dev/en/kick/infrared/07274b7b-0196-4bcf-8711-fcd1640071af/ Huge updates stream] | |||
> "Shrek was a freehold peasant living in an Asiatic mode of production... | > "Shrek was a freehold peasant living in an Asiatic mode of production... He was always cool with whoever the emperor was — didn't want to get involved in politics. But Lord Farquaad wanted to end the Asiatic mode of production and institute private property and eliminate freehold peasants like Shrek and all these fairy-tale creatures... gather them in one place to be slaves and laborers. And that violated the social contract." | ||
== The substance == | == The substance == | ||
Behind the bit | Behind the bit: the Asiatic mode — village communities under an overarching state owning/conceding land, extracting rent rather than capitalist profit — names the '''non-capitalist ordered society''' Western Marxism keeps trying to erase. It connects to the Qing/Ottoman "actual socialism" provocations ([[Qing Dynasty]], [[Ottoman Empire]]): if socialism means state-commanded production against private accumulation, the category stretches historically — and Farquaad's enclosure (primitive accumulation) is the villain, not the order it destroyed ([[We already live in socialism]]). | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Narodniks]] | * [[Narodniks]] | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 21 August 2026
The Asiatic mode of production gets Haz's most memorable exposition — via Shrek.
From the Huge updates stream
> "Shrek was a freehold peasant living in an Asiatic mode of production... He was always cool with whoever the emperor was — didn't want to get involved in politics. But Lord Farquaad wanted to end the Asiatic mode of production and institute private property and eliminate freehold peasants like Shrek and all these fairy-tale creatures... gather them in one place to be slaves and laborers. And that violated the social contract."
The substance
Behind the bit: the Asiatic mode — village communities under an overarching state owning/conceding land, extracting rent rather than capitalist profit — names the non-capitalist ordered society Western Marxism keeps trying to erase. It connects to the Qing/Ottoman "actual socialism" provocations (Qing Dynasty, Ottoman Empire): if socialism means state-commanded production against private accumulation, the category stretches historically — and Farquaad's enclosure (primitive accumulation) is the villain, not the order it destroyed (We already live in socialism).