Toggle menu
611
279
1.4K
7.7K
InfraWiki
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

The OPCW debate — Haz responding to Jackson Hinkle's Vaush debate on the Douma findings (Haz reacts to Vaush vs Jackson).

Hinkle opened accusing Haz's side of "conspiracism" ("I have a lot of experience debating Holocaust deniers"); the actual question was institutional: did the OPCW final report represent its own inspectors' findings, or was the dissenting engineering assessment suppressed? Haz's side: the leaked inspector dissent is the story, and "conspiracism" is what institutions say when their own experts contradict them.

The Douma forensics themselves are at 2018 Douma Chemical Attacks; the Iraq precedent at Scott Ritter, Waging Peace book.

See also

References